Page 16 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 66
P. 16

on  the  enforced  move  will  only  increase,  and  the  nations  and  churches  of
       Europe will have to  be far more strategic,  coordinated  and compassionate in
       their response to those in  desperate need.  I  experienced  this for myself  in  a
       recent visit I was able to make to the migrant camp in Calais. Even in poverty
       and  dispossession,  the  nobility and  strength  of  the  faith of  the  Christians,
       mainly  Ethiopian  Orthodox,  who  find  themselves  trapped  there,  was
       profoundly moving. This  is enforced  diaspora  of  the twenty first  century. As
       Anglicans and Orthodox,  we need to be ready to play our part in shaping this
       coming church of the future. Openness to the Spirit will ensure that the life of
       faith is strengthened for all by the mutual giving and receiving which will form
       part of  the  reality  of  enforced  diaspora.  As Archbishop  Michael  Jackson  of
       Dublin  has written, “In  a  world of enforced  migration  and fearful arrival, in a
       world of accelerated movement, refugees are a gift of apostolicity in a world of
                                                               11
       war-torn  fragmentation  and  courageous  martyrdom.”  Without
       sentimentalising or romanticising the effects of war and poverty, we need to be
       open  to  the  gift  which those  who  have  been  forced  to  flee may be  to  the
       seemingly  settled.  This  may  be  one  of  the  more  surprising  effects  of  the
       benefits of diaspora, but at the same time diaspora brings its own  challenges,
       principally in  the tension  between the center and  the periphery,  however we
       define those terms.

                        Centrifugal & Centripetal Forces

       In  the  situation  of  dispersed  authority  I  have  described,  there  are  natural
       organizational tensions between centrifugal and centripetal forces. While the
       Church is authentically local through unity with the Bishop, at the same time
       it is supra-national  through  the  collegiate relationship  between  the  Bishops.
       This  has  been  a  tension  which  we  can  see  from  the  earliest  origins  of  the
       Church  until  now.  In  Churches  which  do  now  have  a  central  jurisdictional
       authority,  what are  the limits  of  an  agreed  orthodoxy,  what  is  authentically
       local,  and  what  are  first  and  second  order  questions  of  faith? Anglicans
       attempted  to  resolve  this  through  successive  Lambeth  Conferences,  but
       especially that of  1888, which established  the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral
       with its four agreed  points on  what makes a  church authentically Anglican.  I
       remind you what they are:



       11  Michael Jackson, AOOIC, Hawarden, Wales, 8 October 2015


                                       14
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21