Page 27 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 68
P. 27

suggestion: that there should be a fixed date for Easter, for instance, the second
            Sunday of April.  I  cannot believe  that this would  ever be  acceptable to  the
            Orthodox, for it would break completely with the tradition, decreed at Nicaea
            I,  that sees the Christian Pascha  as uniting the three cosmic cycles: the solar,
            the  lunar,  the  weekly.  A  date,  traditionally decided  in  accordance  with  the
            movement of the cosmos—and placing Christ at the centre or conjunction  of
            these  cosmic  cycles—would  be  decided  according  to  the  convenience  of
            modern Western society—to fit in with the spring school holiday!
                  All  I  have said  so  far,  about  the Christian  calendar  as  an  attempt to
            accommodate the cycles of the cosmos, and the importance of these cycles for
            our understanding of who we are in relation to the cosmos, and also as a means
            of giving the drama of redemption cosmic and not merely human significance:
            all this, I hope, shows what is at stake in considering severing the link between
            Pascha  and  the cosmic cycles,  symbolized in  the way determining the date of
            Easter engages with the cycles of the sun, the moon, and the week, the cycle
            closest to  our human  life.  I want to  illustrate this by what might at first sight
            seem an erudite matter, but in the light of what I have said so far, is of direct,
            though symbolic, significance.
                  Byzantine Chronicles  began  with  creation,  and  went  through  the  six
            days  in  which God  created  heaven  and  earth,  before  embarking  on  human
            history. The chroniclers were perfectly clear that the days of creation were not
            ordinary days, but symbolic of the seven days of the week,  ending with God’s
            day of rest. Nevertheless they were keen to identify these days at the beginning
            of  the  Chronicle.  They  followed  certain  principles,  which  is  all  we  need
            concern ourselves with, as in details the chroniclers differed among themselves
            (and  the most  accessible,  The  Chronography  of  George Synkelos,  is  confessedly
                                           8
            unusual in  taking a  line of  its own).  Creation  must have been  at  the spring
            equinox:  the  creation  of plants and  trees on  the third  day would  only make
            sense in  springtime. On  the fourth day sun and moon were created; the moon
            must  have been  created  full (it could  hardly  be created  only partial!),  so  the
            fourth day of  creation  must have been  on  the middle of  a  lunar month,  the
            month the Jews called Nisan, and therefore on 14 Nisan. 14 Nisan is the date of
            the Jewish Passover, which already aligns the redemption of the Jewish people
            at the Exodus with the creation  of the world.  If the first day of  creation was
            the Spring Equinox,  20 March, then the creation of  man would have been  on


            8  See The Chronography of George Synkelos, trans. with introduction and notes by William Adler and
            Paul Tuffin (Oxford University Press, 2002).


                                             25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32