Page 33 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 68
P. 33

see  this in  the  human  capacity for  sadism  as set  out in  Rebelion by  Ivan  in
            Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov.
                  Although  the  Fall  of  humankind  results  in  the  terrible  capacity  for
            spiritual evil becoming human, moral evil, this event also initiates a process of
            spiritual evolution  in  the manner of Teilhard’s  noosphere.  The heroes of  the
            spirit are ‘spiritual mutants’, like their father Ugly (A Tale of Human Origins) who
            stand  out from their  contemporaries more because of  their strangeness than
            their heroism.  A  dialectical  ‘evolutionary’  process is initiated  between  moral
            evil  and  the  external  influence  of  God’s  Spirit  through  ‘mutants’,  through
            whom  the  spiritual quality  of  the  human  may  be  realised  in  the  sanctified
            natural body, even in its organic and biological aspects.
                  The  results  of  the  Fall  described  in  Genesis  3  are  numerous.  They
            include  shame  (v7),  which  involves  hiding  from  God,  and  is  coupled  with a
            pride  that  gradually  leads  towards  paganism.  Another  result  is  a  continual
            struggle  with  the  demonic  forces  of  evil  (Gen.3:15),  and  yet  another  –
            connected  with  shame  and  pride  –  is  a  breakdown  in  relationships.  The
            experience of  Exodus where humans cannot see God  and live is the reality of
            the Fall,  and  is contrasted  with the direct,  immediate communication  of  the
            Garden of Eden.
                  The most important and  conclusive effect, however,  is death.  What is
            meant here is not physical death, but spiritual death.  There is no evidence to
                                                         18
            suggest that natural death was not in the universe before the Fall of Genesis 3.
            Neither is there any evidence to suggest that the animals created in Genesis 1
            and  mentioned  in  Gen  2:19-20  did  not  include  predators,  yet  the  animals
            described are not capable of spiritual death as they are not spiritualised. Men,
            in  common  with Bulgakov does not believe  that humans are responsible for
            death entering the world,  but rather the devil.  He quotes Wisdom 2:23-24  to
            this effect:  ‘for God created  us for incorruption  and  made us in  the image of
            his  own  eternity,  but  through  the  devil’s  envy death  entered  the world,  and
            those  who  belong  to  his  company experience  it’.  Spiritualised  humans  are,
            however, capable of a new kind of death that is spiritual. God’s promise in Gen
            2:17 that Adam will die the day he eats from the tree of the knowledge of good
            and  evil  is clearly false if it refers to  physical death,  suggesting that the real
            referent is in fact this spiritual death . The punishment that Adam ‘will return
                                            19
            to dust’ (Gen 3:19) infers that humans will return to dust and that is al.


            18  Men: Isagogics, p132
            19  Men: Magicism and Monotheism, Appendix 8 Part 7


                                             31
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38