Page 19 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 68
P. 19

should follow them, so that ‘by learning to know the harmonies and revolutions
            of  the world,  [we]  should  bring the intelligent part,  according to  its pristine
            nature,  into  the likeness of  that which intelligence discerns,  and  thereby win
            the fulfilment of  the best life set  by the  gods before mankind  both for  this
            present time and for the time to come’ (Tim. 90acd). 6
                  The centrality of the notion  of  διάστημα to  ancient understanding of
            space and time has a  further important consequence we should  note.  It does
            not mean that space and time are full of ‘gaps’, gulfs of unmeaning, as it were,
            dooming the world  of becoming to ultimate meaninglessness.  Even  for Plato,
            for whom  there  can  be  no  logos  of  anything  in  the realm  of  becoming (Tim.
            29d),  the truth is quite the contrary:  the cosmos,  existing in  space,  and  time
            itself  are  creations  of  the gods;  they have meaning that is  revealed  in  their
            structures,  constituted  by relationship. Time  is for Plato  ‘a  moving  image of
            eternity’ (εἰκὼ… κινητόν τινα αἰῶνος: Tim. 37d): it is ordered towards eternity;
            within the realm of becoming it represents eternity as its image. The sequence
            of time is not meaningless: it discloses eternity.
                  The  Christian  Calendar  is  a  way  of  bringing  into  conjunction  these
            different cycles of  cosmic time, and thus bringing together human time—the
            time of  the microcosm—with the time of  the  cosmos,  or  the  universe.  It is
            often said that there are two conceptions of time—one cyclical and the other
            linear;  one  conceives  of  time  either  as  consisting  of  recurring  cycles,  or  as
            something that moves in  a  kind  of linear way from  the past to the future.  It
            was  popular,  among  theologians  of  the  last  century,  to  oppose  these  two
            notions  of  time  and  see  the  cyclical  as  in  some  sense  Greek  or  pagan,  in
            contrast  to  a  sense  of  time  as  linear,  moving  into  the  future,  which  was
            regarded  as biblical. This seems to me an  oversimplification, for cyclical ways
            of  understanding time are as much a part of  the biblical understanding as the
            sense of a linear movement from creation  to consummation. For it is through
            various cycles,  that repeat themselves,  that we grasp the passage of time. The
            day, the month,  the year: these are cycles related to the circular movement of
            the earth, the moon and  the sun, or, as the ancients would have thought of it,
            the sun, the moon and the sphere of the fixed stars, for it was the movement of
            the sun round the earth that was thought to determine the day, the sequence of
            the phases of the moon that determined the month (much as we still conceive
            it) and the movement through the zodiac of the sphere of the fixed stars that


            6  Translation in F.M. Cornford, Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato (London: routledge and
            Kegan Paul, 1937 [reprint 1971]), 353–4.


                                             17
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24