Page 18 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 70
P. 18

also sent shockwaves through Europe as it seemed that the Islamic forces of
         the Turk were on the verge of invading the rest of the continent. Three years
         later in 1529, Suleiman laid siege to Vienna, and it seemed to many that Eu-
         ropean capitulation to an Islamic invasion was inevitable. Europe had been
         weakened and divided by the religious disputes of the Reformation, and a
         common fear was expressed in the literature of the time that Europe was about
         to turn Muslim.
               As it happened, the siege of Vienna was the pinnacle of the Ottoman
         advance westwards, and despite another attempt in 1532, Suleiman’s armies
         were resisted and turned their attention elsewhere. Throughout the 1520s, the
         Turkish threat paradoxically helped the spread of the Reformation, because it
         preoccupied the attention of Charles V, and it was not until the Ottomans had
         begun to retreat around the turn of the decade, that he was able to turn his
         attention again to resisting the growth of the evangelical movement, by be-
         latedly implementing the Edict of Worms in the late 1520s. Nonetheless, the
         fear of Islamic takeover was very real in Europe during the decade in which the
         Reformation took hold. There was a very live question as to whether a new
         crusade needed to be launched against the Islamic threat, and whether a milit-
         ary or diplomatic solutions should be sought.
               Luther himself expressed on a number of occasions his own slightly
         resigned sense that it is quite possible that Europe’s future was to Islamic. He
         expresses a grudging admiration for Islam, due to its disciplined and ordered
         piety, and the fervency of its adherents, even if he does see it as ultimately de-
         structive of the three estates of the church, temporal government, and mar-
         riage and the family. He was pessimistic about the resilience of European
         Christianity, and its ability to survive a hostile takeover by Islam, due to its
         flabby spiritual state, weakened as he saw it, by centuries of papal teaching, and
         theological and pastoral neglect. Partly because of this pessimism, he backed a
         proposal for a translation of the Qu’ran into Latin by Thomas Bibliander in
         1542, not of course so that Islam could spread in Europe, but so that Christian
         scholars would better refute Islamic claims.
               In 1529, as the Ottomans were laying siege to Vienna, Luther wrote a
         brief treatise entitled ‘On War against the Turk’. He responded to calls for a
         Christian army to defeat the Turks militarily with the argument that the Pope
         certainly should not be engaged in such a venture, and that if Charles V were to
         do so, he should do it firmly in his capacity as Emperor, rather than in his ca-
         pacity as a Christian. There should be no Crusade against Islam in the name of
         Christianity. This of course is an application of his doctrine of the two king-


                                          $16
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23