Page 40 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 40

14
       humans  to  be  ‘conscious  of  [their]  own  organisation’  is  a  revolution.  This
       capacity should not be understood in  purely rational terms: the limitations of
       human ‘rational’ thought, which in Bergsonian terms is action on ‘solid’ bodies,
       are demonstrated by its procession from the very evolutionary process that it is
                    15
       trying to assess.  In fact, spirituality and love are criteria just as important.
            Human society – the spiritual noosphere – is moving towards an ‘Omega
       point’,  a  telos  or spiritual realisation  of  the universe.  Omega  is not,  however,
       simply a final point in time, but an ultimate point outside of time,  that works
       within time and is able to transcend the death of the organism: ‘By death in the
       animal, the radial is reabsorbed into the tangential, while in man it escapes and
       is liberated from it’. 16
            The progress  towards Omega  is  based  on  an  increasing expression  of
       love  –  natural  processes  of  evolution  therefore  have  a  positive  moral
       assessment. Against militant dictatorships (eg. that of Hitler) that might seem
       destined  to  win  the  battle  over  weaker societies,  Teilhard  tells  us that ‘the
       egocentric ideal of  a  future reserved  for those  who  have  managed  to  attain
       egoistically  the  extremity  of  “everyone  for  himself”  is  false  and  against
       nature’.   On  the  contrary  love  as  conceived  by  Teilhard  in  the  noosphere
             17
       emphasises  the  importance  of  the  individual  in  its  evolution  –  the
       personalisation of  ‘All’ in  ‘Omega’  necessarily includes ‘the personalisation  of
       the elements’ reaching their maximum. 18
            Although Teilhard does recognise the ability of humankind to annihilate
           19
       itself,  the world  is  seen  as progressing  inexorably towards a  final (positive)
       spiritual revelation.  Evil is relegated  to  a  short discussion  at  the  end  of  The
       Phenomenon of Man. There Teilhard  writes that there are four kinds of evil:  the
       first of these is characterised as the evil of disorder and failure – ‘Statistically, at
       every  degree  of  evolution,  we  find  evil  always  and  everywhere,  forming and
       reforming implacably in us and around us… This is relentlessly imposed by the
       play of  large numbers at the heart of  a  multitude undergoing organisation’.
                                                                        20
       The other three forms of  evil are decomposition,  anxiety (psychological evil)


       14  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p165
       15  Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution, p7. [Henry Holt and Company. New York. 1911] – available
       reprinted at http://www.amazon.co.uk
       16  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p272
       17  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p244
       18  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p262
       19  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p213
       20  Teilhard, The Phenomenon of Man, p312


                                       38
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45