Page 45 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 45

that we see around us is characterised by Solovyov as enveloped in a ‘heavy and
            tortuous sleep of separate, egoistic beings’, which from a religious point of view
            is  ‘enigmatic  and  requires  explanation’.  Evil  is  something  subjective  and
                                               38
            internal to  being,  understood  in  terms  of the incorrect relation  of  individual
            beings to each other. Therefore, evil as relational is in-itself not substantial. The
            divine  world  has  exactly  the  same  constituents,  but  their  relationships  are
            harmonious.  Solovyov’s answer  to  the  question  of  how this state  could  have
            occurred is ‘feedom’. Evil is seen as a tension within the state of the will – but
            this will and  therefore evil do  not find  their basis in  the physical world. The
            first cause of evil ‘cannot be an individual being as a physical appearance itself
            already conditioned by external determination’. 39
                  1 Jn. 5:19 is of particular significance to Solovyov:  ‘the whole world lies
            under the power of the evil one’. The Russian Synodal Bible simply tells us that
            ‘the  whole  world  lies  in  evil’, 40   which  is  significant  as  Solovyov  does  not
                                              41
            attribute the origins of evil to the devil.  Its origins are not to be found in the
            physical world, but in ‘God’s garden’, understood as a metaphysical entity. The
            origins  of  human  evil  are  found  in  Adam,  understood  as  a  metaphysical
            ‘vsechelovek’ or universal human.
                  In  the Ninth Lecture on  Godmanhood,  Solovyov explains  how  God’s
            freedom is transferred to the world and becomes its own freedom in the act of
            creation, a  process described by Men as kenotic. The result is the World Soul,
            which  personalised  as  ‘the  substantial  subject  of  created  being  and  the
                                          42
            substantial object of divine action’  has a twofold or ambivalent nature.  The
                                                                          43
            actions of  the World  Soul are not determined by one or the other, but she is
            given freedom to choose. As far as she is determined by the divine Logos, she is
            the divine humanity of Christ. On the other hand, the World Soul might strive
            towards singularity, to realise itself in-and-of-itself. When the World Soul does
            this  it  loses  its  power  over  creation  and  harmony  is  lost  in  the  relations
            between  individual  beings:  ‘the  universal  organism  turns  into  a  mechanical
            collection of atoms’.  This means that created beings have not been subjected
                              44
            to  degradation  by  their own  will,  but by  the  will of  the one who  subjected


            38  Solovyov, Lectures on Godmanhood, p180
            39  Solovyov, Lectures on Godmanhood, p185
            40  ‘Ves mir lezhit vo zle’
            41  In the late 1870s Solovyov did not believe in the Devil, but later changed his views.
            42  Solovyov, Lectures on Godmanhood, p192
            43  The Russian here is двойственное
            44  Solovyov, Lectures on Godmanhood, p194


                                             43
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50