Page 49 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 49

so valuable that God sets creation the task of realising it once again and this is
            the  meaning  of  creation  for Berdyaev.  creation  is given  the  task  of  creatively
            realising the freedom of the created soul.
                  For  Berdyaev,  freedom  is  a  mystery  beyond  rational  explanation.  In
            seeking  to  place  freedom  outside  God  he  turns  to  Meister  Eckhart’s
            conception of  Gottheit. ‘In [Gottheit], which is higher than  all the Persons of
            the  Trinity  and  dialectics  connected  with  them  all  antinomianism  is
            pre-eternally and absolutely overcome, but in relation to it even disappears the
            question of existence and non-existence. But about the [Gottheit], nothing can
                                                                     59
            be said – it is inexpressable and relationship to it is super-religious’.  Freedom,
            as  non-existence,  is  able  to  find  its  origins  in  this  principle  of  ultimate
            transcendence.  However,  from  the perspective  of  Christian  orthodoxy,  Men
            finds  this  way  of  explaining  freedom  and  the  evil  that  results  from  it
            questionable.
                  Men, commenting on Berdyaev’s conception of ‘freedom’ in Appendix 8
            of ‘Magicism and Monotheism’ tells us that for Berdyaev in his Philosophy of a Free
            Spirit,  it  is  an  ‘unconditional,  irrational  spontaneity’. 60   He  finds  this  idea
            appealing.  In  situating  this  freedom  in  Gottheit or  later  Ungrund,  however,
            rather  than  God,  Men  writes  that  Berdyaev  is  moving  towards  a  dualistic
            conception  of  the  universe.  For  Berdyaev,  God  created  the  world  out  of
                                     61
            nothing (nichego), but this nothing (’nichego’ – lack of anything) is not nothing
            (’nishto’ – absolute ‘nothing’).  It  is instead  a  dark,  chaotic world  of  freedom
            uncreated  by God.  God lacks control over the world, despite the fact he will
            eventually  defeat  the  chaos  that  is  in  it.  Men  comments  that  Berdyaev’s
            realisation  that God  is not king over suffering is  correct,  but his attempt  to
            ground the freedom that allows for evil ontologically outside God is not.
                  In  places,  Men  does  show  considerable  admiration  for  Berdyaev’s
            attempt to resolve the problem  of  evil. In The Strugle and Polarisation of Good
                    62
            and Evil,  he describes it as ‘the most interesting attempt’ and in an interview
            with Mark Makarov  he also refers to it as one of the most interesting answers
                             63
            to the question  of evil. However, this does not mean that in his own thinking

            59  Berdyaev, Philosophy of Freedom, Part 2 Chapter 5:1
            60  Men, Magicism and Monotheism, Appendix 8
            61  Men, Lectures on Russian Religious Philosophy
            62  Men, Conversation about Redemption, contained in World Spiritual Culture. Мировая духовная
            культура. [Фонд имени Александра Меня. Москва. 2002 г. ] [Alexander Men Foundation.
            Moscow. 2002.] – can be found at http://www.alexandermen.ru/pan.html
            63  Shukman/Roberts, p35


                                             47
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54