Page 47 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 47

that  he  emphasises  the  most  in  his  lecture  on  Solovyov. 50   The  strong
            understanding of freedom  that permeates all Solovyov’s  writing on  evil is his
            most important influence on Men in this area,  although it is a theme that is
                                                    51
            developed and adapted as we shall see below.
            II. NIKOLAI BERDYAEV (1874-1948)

            Berdyaev develops Solovyov’s ‘freedom’ in his work, The Philosophy  of Freedom.
            Men cites this work at the end of chapter 4 of Origins of Religion: the idea that
            God  should  have  created  a  world  without  suffering  ‘is  fruit  of  human
            limitations and shows  a  lack  of awareness of  the meaning of  existence,  since
            this meaning is bound up with the irrational mystery of the freedom to sin… If
            evil were outwardly removed  by force and compulsion,  and  if  goodness were
            something necessary and  inevitable,  then  the work of each individual and  the
            perfection of being would be devalued… According to the plan of creation, the
            cosmos has been  set as a  task, as an  idea, which is to be creatively realised by
            the freedom of the created soul’. 52
                  We  shall  consider  how  Berdyaev  uses  his  conception  of  freedom  to
            explain  the  presence  of  evil  in  terms  of  ‘meaning’,  beginning  with  his
            understanding of the Fall. Then we shall review the limitations of this approach
            as considered by Men.
                  For Berdyaev,  the Biblical story of  the Fall in Genesis 3 is the religious
            ‘source’ for understanding how suffering and evil came to be in the world, but
            he  tells  us  ‘it  is  important  to  understand  the  mythological  and  symbolic
            character of the story of Genesis about Adam and Eve’.  He goes on to tell us
                                                            53
            that while the Bible sends us back to the sources of existence, ‘there is no clear
                                                                    54
            boundary distinguishing what is in time from what is before time’  since there
            was no such boundary in the ancient consciousness.
                  There are also  philosophical reasons  why science has no  access to  the
            story of the Fall. The role of science is to  understand the structure of nature,
            but it cannot understand the origins  of the order of  nature.  The Fall itself  is





            50  Men, Lectures on Russian Religious Philosophy.
            51  As it is for both Berdyaev and Bulgakov
            52  Cited by Men, translated in Shukman/Roberts, p52
            53  Berdyaev, Nikolai. The Philosophy of Freedom, Part 2 Chapter 5:1. Бердяев, Николай. Философия
            Свободы [АСТ, Москва, 2010] [AST, Moscow, 2010] – can be found at http://www.krotov.info
            54  Berdyaev, Philosophy of Freedom, Part 2 Chapter 5:1


                                             45
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52