Page 50 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 50

he adopts Berdyaev’s system, with its dualistic implications. The most obvious
       influence of Berdyaev on Men’s thinking here is in the absolute irrationality of
       evil, the fact that rationality cannot attain an  understanding of the origins of
       evil  by  definition.  This  is  an  emphasis  that  runs  through  all  of  Men’s
       discussions on the subject.
       III. SERGEI BULGAKOV (1871-1944)
       In common  with Berdyaev and Solovyov, Bulgakov relates the Biblical story of
       Creation and Fall to a higher pre-temporal existence. He refers to these stories
       as representing a ‘meta-historical’ reality. His most extended discussion  of  the
       topic can be found in his late work, The Bride of the Lamb.
            We  shall briefly consider  Bulgakov’s  views of  science,  the Fall and  the
       interplay of freedom, evil and meaning. We shall compare these conceptions to
       those of Men, then summarise Men’s reception of Bulgakov.
            Bulgakov was  condemned  as  a  heretic by the  Moscow  Patriarchate in
                                            64
       1935, an act, which Men did not approve of.  Although the major concern was
                                                   65
       Bulgakov’s  sophiological understanding  of  creation,  his  evolutionary  views
       were also anathematised. This condemnation is not recognised by all Orthodox
       churches,  but  it  is  still  referred  to  by  Russian  Orthodox  of  the  Moscow
                 66
       Patriarchate.  Bulgakov’s evolutionary views are made explicit in the following:
       ‘To  a  literal  interpretation  of  Genesis  3,  however,  is  opposed  the  modern
       scientific  consciousness,  which  has  been  brought  up  on  principles  of
       evolutionism’. 67
            Further to this, we read on the same page:  ‘Science utterly fails to find
       traces of this original edenic state of man on earth and therefore considers the
       very supposition of  such a  state to  be incompatible with the empirical data’.
       Bulgakov,  like Berdyaev,  believes this is not because the stories of Genesis 1-3
       do not represent a reality, but because ‘the language of empirical history cannot
       be used to represent meta-historical events’.  Genesis 1-3 uses the language of
                                            68
       symbols  and  myths  and  these  are  mythologies  stored  in  the  memory  of
       humankind as an  ‘echo’ of prehistoric or meta-historical events.  Bulgakov sees


       64  Men, Lectures on Russian Religious Philosophy
       65  A view developed from Solovyov's understanding of Wisdom – Men did not adhere to Bulgakov's
       sophiology, but viewed it as a permissable theological opinion – Men, Lectures on Russian Religious
       Philosophy
       66  See Fr. Daniil Sysoev's list of Men's ‘heresies’
       67  Bulgakov, Sergei. The Bride of the Lamb, p167. [Eerdmans. Grand Rapids. 2002]
       68  Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb, p170


                                       48
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55