Page 51 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 67
P. 51

the edenic period as one preceding the current natural age and draws parallels
            with the eschatological future age, which is equally inaccessible. In this respect,
            he is far from Teilhard,  who describes the organic ‘inner’  evolution  of world
            consciousness towards Omega. In Bulgakov, we see in  common  with the later
            Solovyov a ‘descending’ rather than ‘ascending’ understanding of world history.
                  In  Bulgakov’s writing this separation  of  ages  is seen  as a  result of  the
            Fall: ‘Adam’s Fall was a catastrophe that changed the fate of the world. It was an
            impenetrable wall that separated his original state from his later state,  so that
            in the later state one can no longer find traces of the original state (except in
            obscure anamnesis, slumbering in the human soul)’. 69
                  Bulgakov posits a  qualitative distinction  between  humans and  animals:
            ‘this  evolutionary  connection  of  man  with  his  animal  ancestors  does  not
            exhaust the main  thing in him, his humanity, which consists in the image and
                                                                 70
            likeness of  God,  which are not  proper to  the animal world’.  Bulgakov,  like
            Men  as  we  shall  see,  views  this  difference  as  an  ‘ontological  hiatus’.  For
            Bulgakov,  this  ontological  difference  in  the  human  has  consequences  for
            original  sin.  Since  man,  with  spirit,  was  called  to  be  ‘the  cultivator  and
            protector  of  the  cosmos’,  his  failure  and  subjection  to  the World  Soul  has
            subjected the natural world to vanity.
                  The  appearance  of  spirit  in  the  human  is  inexplicable  in  terms  of
            evolution, so evolution therefore cannot be applied to an understanding of the
            human spirit as in Teilhard’s noosphere. Men agrees with Bulgakov concerning
            the necessity of  ‘external movement’ in the development of the human  spirit,
            but does not altogether abandon the developmental ideas of Teilhard.
                  Bulgakov sees freedom in modal terms. It can exist to different extents
            depending on the ontological status of the being that possesses it. The angels
            are free and  some used  their freedom  to  turn  against God.  For Bulgakov,  an
            Angelic Fall is closely connected  with the corruption  of the World Soul: ‘[the
            fallen  angels]  are transformed  into  demons and  participate in  the life of  the
            human  world,  through man  himself,  as well as through the animal world  and
            the  natural  world  in  general.  The  world  soul  becomes  sick  with  demon
            possession’.  Evil is seen by Bulgakov as having creative power insofar as it is
                      71
            an  expression of demonic self-assertion.  Bulgakov finds particular significance
            in  the  serpent  in  the  Garden  of  Eden:  ‘The  beginning  of  evil  in  man  is…



            69  Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb, p171
            70  Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb, p174
            71  Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb, p159


                                             49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56