Page 39 - AECA.org.uk ¦ Koinonia 68
P. 39

interpretation is the precise relationship between the realms of the angels and
            the natural world. For example, the relationship between the angels and time
            and rationality in the world we experience is left unclear.
                  If  Men  is  to  be  successful  in  rejecting  the  kind  of  metaphysical,
            meta-historical entity presupposed  by  Bulgakov,  then  he must do  more than
            simply assert a close relation between the natural world and angels. The answer
            to  this  problem  is  in  the  distinction  between  Men  and  Bulgakov  in  their
            conceptions  of  spiritual  metaphysics:  Men  denies the metaphysical world  of
            the angels ontological priority  over the natural world as we experience it. The
            natural  world  does  not  develop  out  of  a  pre-  or  super-temporal  world,  but
            rather the ‘metaphysical’ world  of  the angels, the transphysical world  and  the
            natural world occupy the same ontological status together, created together by
            the Creator God. Any cosmic Fall is not prior to the Creation of the physical
            world,  but it must nonetheless permeate it completely as it is precipitated in
            the metaphysical spiritual realms, potentially beyond time and rationality.
                  Just as it is for Solovyov, Berdyaev, and Bulgakov, freedom is for Men the
            quality in creation that allows for the possibility of the Fall(s), bringing with it
            the  spiritual  quality  of  being  made  in  the  ‘image  and  likeness  of  God’.
                                                             34
            Described  as  one of  his ‘master themes’  by Evdokimov ,  it occupies a  very
            significant  place  in  his  lectures  and  conversations.  In  both  these  and  his
            writings, freedom is often described using analogies.  For example, we are told
            in chapter 9 of Origins of Religion, that ‘if the human were not in a  position  to
            choose another path, apart from following the will of God, if he were forced to
            follow the good, then he would appear as a strictly programmed mechanism or
                                         35
            a puppet and not a God-like being’ .
                  In Magicism and Monotheism Human freedom is seen as the highest kind
                             36
            of  created  freedom ,  although the  variance  in  creation  itself,  including  the
            possibility of  destructive  forces  present  from  Gen  1:2  onwards,  is  seen  as  a
            natural  precursor  to  the  full  freedom  found  in  humans .  This  variance  or
                                                              37
            freedom primarily demonstrates the creativity and positivity of creation, rather
            than its corruption. In Appendix 8 Part 11, Men sees the universal freedom of
            created  beings in  terms  of  kenosis,  a  characteristic of  the Godhead which is




            34  Evdokimov, Michel. Fr. Alexander Men: Martyr of Atheism, p8. [Gracewing, Leominster. 2011]
            35  Men: Origins of Religion, Part 2, Chapter 9. (Appendix.2:39)
            36  Men: Magicism and Monotheism Appendix 8 Part 3
            37  Men: Magicism and Monotheism Appendix 8 Part 9


                                             37
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44